Welcome at this

Nature Protection Foundation webpage,

about the very nature- and environment friendly principle of behaviour, called:

 

~ Climatism ~

 

"Climatism" stands for:

"In principle not using anything,

that has to be got from another climate zone,

and not going to places, that are situated in such an other zone".

 

What does this mean in practice?

- In the first place it means, that in principle one doesn't use any foodproducts, that only grow in another climate.

- In the second place, one in principle doesn't use any such materials.

- Thirdly in principle one doesn't go to places, that are situated in one of the seven other climate-zones.

("In principle" means, that there can be circumstances, that force to make one ore more exceptions to the rule).

 

The eight climate-zones

There are four different kinds of climate zones on both the Northern and the Southern hemisphere.

- The tropical one; from Equator (degree 0), up/down untill about the 25th degree of latitude.

- The sub-tropical one; from about the 25th, up/down untill about the 50th.

- The temperate one; between the 50th and the 75th degree.

- The polar one; from the 75th, up to the pole (degree 100).

(Officially the frontier between the tropical zone and the sub-tropical one is on the 23d degree, whereas there's no degree, that officially forms the frontier between the subtropical and the temperate zone. To the NPF it is more systhematicaly and easier to handle, when each zone simply comprises 25 degrees. For in reality zone frontiers are very winding anyway).

 

Arguments in favour of Climatism

Environmental:

- Transportation to and from places in another climate is mostly long-distance; which means, that it takes much fuel and as a consequence leads to much pollution of air, water and soil; the more miles, the more pollution !

- People that racially belong in a more sunny zone, when staying or living in a less sunny one, mostly spent espessially autumn and winter inside a house, where they mostly need a lot of energy for purposes such as heating and elctrical lighting. Moreover for their transportation as well they strongly prefer means, that confront them as little as possible with the climatological facts of their living area.  No need to say, that this is stimulating global heating esentially.

 Human:

- Use of products from other climates often leads to neo-colonial situations in the countries, where they are grown. On the other hand it creates dependence of the 'using' countries, which can lead to situations, that are much more grave, than having to stop that use; for instance racial problems.

- Related to the former argument is the territorial one; in nature as good as all creatures have there own territorium; all different human races naturally belong in a certain climate zone; it's important to respect at least this limit, notwithstanding the fact, that it is very easy to be denied nowadays, by use of technical means of transportation.

-Loss of natural global racial proportions and balance. Due to the fact, that people on Earth in this technical way more and more pass natural barriers against it, they have more and more personal contacts with persons of other races. This leads to more and more births of mixed-race children, including those of one blond and one blackhaired person. Now, as in these last mentioned cases genetically the darkhaired gen mostly dominates, the result is, that the blond human race by now is becoming extinct. (About this also:(http://www.vivism.info/pageID_5792802.html).

- Physical health; because man's physical structure is created in harmony with one specific climate (and other elements of his biotope), it can be (very) unhealthy, to stay in another one; (for instance because of getting too much, or too little sunshine(-vitamines)). For a person's skin in principle is designed on the intensity of sunshine in one special climate. The more sunny this is, the more pigment is added, for protectional reasons. So when a tropical person permanently lives  in the temparate zone, this results in a shortage of sun vitamins, because the relatively faint sunbeams, that occur above the 50th degree, just can't get (sufficiently) through that skin, designed to match with the most intensive ones there are. A shortage of vitamins is known to lead to a reduced functioning of the organs.

 

Now  what exactly does a climatist

in principal not use (any more) and leave behind otherwise?

- As said before, in the first place foodproduts, that have to be got from another climate. So a sub-tropical climatist in principal doesn't eat and drink products, that have to be got from the tropical zone; this means, that among others chocolate and vanilla are not on the menu (any more). A climatist in the temperate zone in principle doesn't (buy and) use sub-tropical food eather; which means, that banana's, pine-apples, mango's, papaya's, rice, coffee, tea, pepper, cashew-nuts, (all originally tropical, but by now also grown in many subtropical countries), oranges, lemons, melons, grapefruits, figs, olives, pinda's, etc. in principle are not on the menu eather. (An exception can be made for persons, having (partly) (sub-)tropical roots; they most probably nead this kind of food for a percentage, corresponding with the one of their (sub-)tropicallity; (see "Exeptions to the rule" furter on).

- Secondly non-food products, that only grow in another climate. For instance materials like tropical (hard-)wood, bamboo, seal of polar animals (this also for non-vegans), rubber (as far as possible), etcetera.

- Interzonal tourism; those, who are aware of the territorium-principle, of pollution caused by transportation and of the relation between health and climate, don't spend their vacations in another climate zone.

- Related to the former item is emigration; in this field however, the territorium-principle and the health-aspect are still weighing much heavier.

- Finally one can ask him/herself, whether and in how far it is better, because more natural, to avoid (especcially private) personal contact with persons, that, from the etnological point of view, belong in another climate zone.

 

Exceptions to the rule

In practice the Climatistic rules will have to be passed to a certain extent, in several cases.

-  In case somebodies roots are in more than one climate-zone, he or she may need (additive) fruits and climatological conditions from resp. in more than one zone.

 -  Of course zone-frontiers are not real frontiers. They are theoretical lines. Now, because people naturally have a certain range of action, which can be put on a circle, around the place in which they live, this circle passes the zone-frontier partly, if their living place is near to such a frontier. So the second exeption to the rule is: In case one is living near to a zone-frontier, (s)he is 'allowed' to pass that frontier up to a certain number of kilometers/miles.

- It occurs, that quality of the own kind of fruit in especcially the temperate zone is that terribly bad, (wheter or not due to a purely gains-obsessed mentality of growers, of in many cases subtropical origine), that in order to have sufficiently healthy food available, one has to choose for fruits from other zones (as well).

 

----------